2017 Ford Explorer Owner Reviews

Average Rating for 2017

4.2

142 Verified Owner Ratings

5 Stars

72

4 Stars

52

3 Stars

15

2 Stars

3

1 Stars

0

What Owners Love

2017 Ford Explorer owners rated their vehicle across 25 attributes. Here are the three they loved most.

Cargo Space

307

Interior Storage

237

Navigation System

210

Top 2017 Reviews

Linda F. from NC

Verified Owner · Sep, 2016

No Rating

2017 Ford Explorer Platinum 4WD

No Rating

100% awesome

David L. from IA

Verified Owner · May, 2017

2017 Ford Explorer Sport 4WD

4.0

The Sync 3 system is hands down the best system for infotainment on the market and these cars are low maintenance, fairly priced and provide great value. I highly recommend them.

Denise Z. from CA

Verified Owner · May, 2017

No Rating

2017 Ford Explorer XLT FWD

No Rating

It is fun to drive.

Zelda D. from NE

Verified Owner · May, 2017

2017 Ford Explorer Base 4WD

5.0

safe to drive

P J. from CA

Verified Owner · May, 2017

No Rating

2017 Ford Explorer Sport 4WD

No Rating

Handles well, looks great, good cargo space. Had to buy running boards at an additional cost of 600.00. ( Ford does not make them for this model)

James D. from CA

Verified Owner · Jun, 2017

No Rating

2017 Ford Explorer XLT 4WD

No Rating

Reliable, roomy

Richard M. from NC

Verified Owner · May, 2017

2017 Ford Explorer Sport 4WD

4.0

The Explorer is a large, comfortable and pricey SUV that is built for hauling trailers.

Scott W. from WA

Verified Owner · Jun, 2017

No Rating

2017 Ford Explorer Sport 4WD

No Rating

Good power, fuel economy so-so, not as good in snow than expected. Seats not as comfortable as should be for a vehicle of this class. Nice interior and entertainment system.

Jim S. from VA

Verified Owner · Dec, 2017

2017 Ford Explorer Sport 4WD

5.0

My explorer came fully loaded and I'm excited to have some of these new amenities to help me enjoy my riding experience more.

Linda R. from MO

Verified Owner · Dec, 2017

2017 Ford Explorer Base FWD

5.0

It's everything I wanted and then some.